🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.